Bug Tracking in Lark Bitable: Free Template + Webhook Auto-Sync (2026)

Manage Bugs with Lark Bitable: The Bottom Line First

Managing bugs with Lark Bitable = one structured tracking table + one tool that writes entries automatically. The table handles "recording" โ€” filterable, collaborative, easy to revisit; the tool handles "entry" โ€” zero effort for whoever finds or submits the bug. This article gives you a free template with 13 standard fields, the trade-offs between manual and automatic entry, a multi-table routing plan, and group notifications without writing a single line of code. Who it's for: small and mid-sized teams that collaborate in Lark (QA, product, vendor acceptance) and haven't adopted Jira yet โ€” or find Jira too heavy.

Why manage bugs in Bitable instead of a group bot or Excel

Option Problem
Group bot messages Instant but intrusive: in a busy group the cards get buried fast and are hard to find afterwards
Excel / Google Sheets Not collaborative, loses context (screenshots and environment info are hard to attach), versions get messy easily
Professional tools like Jira Heavy for small teams: both seat costs and setup costs are high
Lark Bitable Structured ledger + multiple views (table/kanban) + permission-based collaboration; plenty within the free quota
One-line summary: messaging tools are for "notifying"; tables are for "recording and following up". The core actions of bug management are assigning and following up, so a ledger format fits better.

Free bug tracking table template: 13 standard fields

Create a new Bitable and add fields as shown below (the Webhook method recommended below requires a one-time field mapping in the flow; the custom app method creates missing fields automatically):
Field Type Content
Description Multiline text Issue description (line breaks preserved)
Page URL Hyperlink URL of the page with the issue (sensitive parameters redacted)
Page Title Text Title of the page with the issue
Browser Text Chrome / Edge and version
Operating System Text Windows / macOS, etc.
Resolution Text Screen size
Console Errors Number Number of console errors
Network Errors Number Number of failed requests
Screenshot Hyperlink Link to the annotated screenshot (doesn't expire)
Share Link Hyperlink Detail page any team member can open
Submitted At Date When the issue was submitted
Expires At Date How long the link is kept
Synced At Date When the record was written to the table
Two design notes: the screenshot and share link use hyperlink fields โ€” one click to view, no attachment space taken. Once the table is ready, you can add views freely in the Bitable: a kanban by "status", sorted by submission time, filtered by owner.

Two ways to enter bugs: manual vs automatic sync

<br /> Manual entry BugCapturer automatic sync
Operation Copy-paste the description, attach screenshots by hand Annotate the screenshot โ†’ click "Share" โ†’ a row appears automatically
Context completeness Environment info easily missing Page/browser/OS/resolution/diagnostic counts included automatically
Screenshot Upload the attachment manually Annotated image link generated automatically
Who can enter Whoever knows how to use the table Anyone, just install the extension
Cost per entry About 3โ€“5 minutes A few seconds
Conclusion: you can run manually for a week during validation; once the field structure proves right, connect automatic sync so "whoever finds the bug" never has to touch the table.

How to configure automatic sync (recommended Webhook method, 4 steps)

Prerequisites: a Lark account + the target Bitable (with edit permission). No Lark app to create and no admin approval needed โ€” a few clicks in the table and you're done.
  • Create an automation flow in Lark: open the Bitable โ†’ "Automation" โ†’ "New flow"; for the trigger choose "When a Webhook request is received" and copy the generated Webhook URL (we recommend enabling Bearer Token validation to prevent forged requests).
  • Fill in the configuration in BugCapturer: sign in at app.bugcapturer.com โ†’ Settings โ†’ Integrations โ†’ Add integration โ†’ choose "Automation Webhook trigger" (recommended), paste the Webhook URL (add the Bearer Token if you enabled token validation), and click "Verify & Save". On save, BugCapturer sends a test request to that URL.
  • Map the fields: back in the Lark flow editor, under "Output settings" choose "Set via request" โ€” Lark automatically detects the test request it just received and lists all fields; map description, page URL, screenshot link, etc. to the table columns one by one, then save and enable the flow.
  • Verify: click "Test" on the integration card on the integrations page โ€” a new record appears in the table right away, and the connection is done.
  • > To skip field mapping and let the server create missing standard columns automatically, switch to the "custom enterprise app" method (App ID / App Secret) instead โ€” see the Lark Bitable integration guide on the docs site. Reliability: failed writes are retried automatically, and you can check the result of every delivery on the settings page.

    Multiple tables: one for request A, one for request B

    Each account supports up to 3 integrations, each pointing to a different table. When sharing from the extension you can pick the "sync target", so different requests can be managed separately in their own tables.

    Want group notifications? Use Lark's built-in automation โ€” zero code

    Bitable comes with built-in automation: when a record is added, a Lark group message is sent automatically. Three steps:
  • Open the Bitable โ†’ "Automation" โ†’ New flow
  • For the trigger, choose "When a record is added"
  • For the action, choose "Send Lark message" to the designated group, quoting the "Description" and "Share Link" fields in the message body
  • Combined, you get the full pipeline: the extension writes the ledger (recording) + the table's automation pushes to the group (notifying) โ€” two legs doing their own jobs without stepping on each other.

    Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

    How far can Lark Bitable go for bug management? Anything below a hundred people and single tables of up to tens of thousands of rows is fine. Beyond that, consider a professional defect-tracking system, or treat the Bitable only as a "capture ledger" and move high-priority items into Jira manually. How do screenshots get into the table? They're written to the "Screenshot" hyperlink field โ€” a link that opens the annotated original image right away. Does it cost anything? BugCapturer's integration feature is free (up to 3 integrations per account); on the Lark side, everything works within the Bitable free quota โ€” see Lark's official documentation for details. Do anonymous submissions end up in the table? No. Writes are only triggered when a signed-in user shares; anonymous shares never write to the table โ€” one more reason to have your team register and sign in.

    Conclusion

    Using Lark Bitable as a bug ledger is the lowest-cost starting point for small and mid-sized teams: build the table with the field list in this article (or let the tool create it), hand entry over to the browser extension's automatic sync, and round it off with the table's built-in automation for group notifications. The whole pipeline can be up and running the same day, without writing a single line of code. Further reading: Lark Bitable integration announcement ยท Bug report template